An earlier revision offered "103-113h if the rate doubles to 100/s as repositories shrink" as an optimistic scenario. That was speculation and the data now contradicts it. Batch intervals are a clean rate measurement, since each batch is exactly 100,000 repos. Seven consecutive intervals over five hours: 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 40, 48 repos/s. Median 47, no trend. The rate rose 6.6 -> 47 while the crawl left the large-repository head, then stopped. So the finish is 152-173h elapsed at the measured rate, overrunning the 120-hour envelope by 32-53 hours, before merge and cutover. Removed the doubling scenario rather than leaving a flattering number in the record. Caught while checking a hunch: two batches had completed between check-ins and rough arithmetic suggested 74/s, which would have been reported as acceleration. Measuring the intervals properly gave 47/s flat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>