A community based topic aggregation platform built on atproto

docs(posts): correct two review-flagged comment inaccuracies master

The consumer-vs-service error-disposition comment claimed the rev gate stops a redrive from reaching the sweep; in fact the consumer reconsiders the sweep on every redelivery whose row is already tombstoned — so its swallow is a genuine choice, which is what makes the service's surface-instead the real departure. The wiring comment claimed the shared writer means a shared clock/retry budget; the writer is stateless per call, so it is shared configuration, not budget. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QDvRJ45k6E5KrBARDHUtiM


+15 -9
2 changed files