From 6b8219be40e63766e7a2f82ee99cd7be924ef92f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zzstoatzz Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 04:58:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] docs: flag that the gate's basis commit is behind the artifact that ran semantic-parity.md is based on Stream eb95c14, but experiment 6 deployed 29705cb. Fifteen commits separate them and three touch bootstrap behaviour the audit has rows for: the byte-budget deletion (e2ab25c), concurrent repository parsing (fb3cea4), and the batch deadlock fix (fcc63f8). Deliberately does NOT rewrite the basis hash to 29705cb. Moving it would assert an audit nobody performed, which is the exact failure the file's opening paragraph forbids. Records the gap, names the three commits owed a re-confirmation, and leaves re-basing as its own explicit act. Also defines Atmos, which appears in four docs and is never explained: the Go atproto library upstream runs, pinned here as a comparison reference rather than as a Stream dependency -- which is why it is correctly absent from build.zig.zon. Notes by contrast that the Zat pin does match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) --- docs/semantic-parity.md | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/semantic-parity.md b/docs/semantic-parity.md index ce92da6..627800e 100644 --- a/docs/semantic-parity.md +++ b/docs/semantic-parity.md @@ -11,10 +11,27 @@ shape, or because a test written around Stream's implementation passes. - admitted artifact: `sha256:4300104135c6fd35bd13a264b744c5f842c41ee9a51e0cf1c57c9a59640551a2` (`receipts/eb95c14.json`, 20/20 suites, built natively on linux/amd64) - upstream Jetstream: `f29815c391fc2644f8a3dd36b899fb3697dd1ea6` -- Atmos: `v0.2.14` -- Zat: `955e9ca9afb41d66d41e998803f6fcfc8fc4330f` (v0.3.22) +- Atmos: `v0.2.14` — the Go atproto library upstream Jetstream V2 runs, and the + reference for repair, hosting-policy and rate-limiting behaviour. It is + *upstream's* dependency, not one of Stream's, so it does not appear in + `build.zig.zon`; it is pinned here because rows compare against it. +- Zat: `955e9ca9afb41d66d41e998803f6fcfc8fc4330f` (v0.3.22) — Stream's own + atproto library, and this pin does match `build.zig.zon`. - audit date: 2026-07-28 +> **The basis commit is behind the artifact that actually ran experiment 6.** +> This audit is based on Stream `eb95c14`, but the deployed image was `29705cb` +> (`receipts/29705cb.json`, `sha256:0f45468c…`). Fifteen commits separate them, +> and three change bootstrap behaviour this audit has rows for: `e2ab25c` deleted +> the in-flight byte budget, `fb3cea4` made repository parsing concurrent, and +> `fcc63f8` broke the batch submit/consume deadlock. +> +> The basis is deliberately **not** rewritten to `29705cb` here — moving the hash +> would assert an audit against that commit that nobody has performed, which is +> precisely the "marked more strongly than it can prove" failure this file opens +> by forbidding. Treat the bootstrap rows as owed a re-confirmation against +> `29705cb`, and re-base the audit as its own deliberate act. + Earlier receipts remain valid for the digests they cover — a receipt proves those suites passed against *that* image, and that stays true. "Admitted" means "earned a receipt", not "current", so confirm an artifact matches the commit -- 2.51.2