diff --git a/src/content/posts/news/prediction-markets-debate.mdx b/src/content/posts/news/prediction-markets-debate.mdx
index 01b42d4..c568084 100644
--- a/src/content/posts/news/prediction-markets-debate.mdx
+++ b/src/content/posts/news/prediction-markets-debate.mdx
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ author: "@tanuki"
 ---
 On April 28th, four Hack Clubbers held a public debate on whether prediction markets do more good or harm. @Rowan and @Sahil argued in favor of the idea that they do more good than harm, while @Eternal and @Maxstellar argued against.
 
+*Editor's note: a recording of the debate is available on Slack [here](https://hackclub.slack.com/archives/C0A2BPB7202/p1778100775148449)*
+
 For the purposes of this debate:
 
 - A prediction market is a platform where people can bet on the outcome of future events. By buying and selling shares in the outcomes, participants collectively forecast the likelihood of events such as sports results, political elections, or entertainment awards.
@@ -40,4 +42,4 @@ Both sides agreed that prediction markets are gambling, and that insider trading
 
 What are your thoughts?
 
-*Editor's note: you can now submit pieces as responses to other pieces. Have something to share on prediction markets? Submit it to `@eps`*
\ No newline at end of file
+*Editor's note: you can now submit pieces as responses to other pieces. Have something to share on prediction markets? Submit it to `@eps`*