From 9a6f924998e7950808453a5ff19e000c774cfcbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mgrani Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:17:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Link the partial-listing proposal from the review that opened it The status line already records the item as knowingly open; this points at where it is now scoped, so the two do not drift apart. --- docs/review/remote_pull_and_mirror_operability_2026-08-04.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/review/remote_pull_and_mirror_operability_2026-08-04.md b/docs/review/remote_pull_and_mirror_operability_2026-08-04.md index 65cd264..1c8a377 100644 --- a/docs/review/remote_pull_and_mirror_operability_2026-08-04.md +++ b/docs/review/remote_pull_and_mirror_operability_2026-08-04.md @@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ Status: **closed** — every finding is released. F1 and F5 in v5.6.0; F2 and F7 in v5.7.0; F3, F4, F6 and F8 in v5.8.0. One item is knowingly left open and recorded under F3: a caller still cannot tell that a listing was *partial* when -one repository failed and another answered. +one repository failed and another answered — now scoped in +[`partial_listing_contract_2026-08-06.md`](partial_listing_contract_2026-08-06.md) +at the maintainer's request, since closing it changes `list()` and the +`/remote/ls` response. Author: claude (Opus 5), 2026-08-04 Scope: `owilix/core/tasks/remote.py`, `owilix/http_api/server.py`, packaging Source of evidence: the OpenWebSearch.eu `ourrs` clusters (owilix **5.5.1** -- 2.51.2