From 70045a32a0d8c4db39a3d18742b1991ed2debbf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian van der Loo Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:53:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] fix post --- ...next-social-revolution.md => borrowing-network-effects.md} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename src/content/blog/{next-social-revolution.md => borrowing-network-effects.md} (96%) diff --git a/src/content/blog/next-social-revolution.md b/src/content/blog/borrowing-network-effects.md similarity index 96% rename from src/content/blog/next-social-revolution.md rename to src/content/blog/borrowing-network-effects.md index 275112f..91943a8 100644 --- a/src/content/blog/next-social-revolution.md +++ b/src/content/blog/borrowing-network-effects.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- title: Borrowing Network Effects -date: 2026-01-01 +date: 2026-02-18 description: Using someone else’s network to pull in an existing audience is a powerful tool for any social media app. slug: borrowing-network-effects tags: [bluesky, atproto] @@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ When Meta launched Threads, they did something interesting. They cross-advertise This brings me back to an experience I had this morning. I opened a new app called [Popfeed](https://popfeed.social/); it feels like a mashup of Letterboxd and Goodreads, but built AT Protocol. I signed in with my AT Protocol account. Lo and behold, all the people I follow on Bluesky were just... there! My feed was already filled with people that I recognized, interacting and rating movies. And unlike Threads, Bluesky doesn’t own Popfeed - Popfeed was just built on AT Protocol. -I believe AT Protocol will win. If for any reason, it’s because of the positive feedback loop of network effects, and that any developer can contribute a new app to this existing network. \ No newline at end of file +I believe AT Protocol will win. If for any reason, it’s because of the positive feedback loop of network effects, and that any developer can contribute a new app to this existing network. -- 2.51.2